I insisted that we
have a call. If we don’t have a regular
call, we’ll spin out and not keep consistency.
“Every company I’ve ever been in has a weekly call.” This is something we must do. OK. OK. So, we shall. Tomorrow. At 8:00AM.
Yeah. Made that
point. Then, I consider. Every other week I have my wife fill in for
me when this 8:00AM Thursday call is on the calendar. But she’s on-the-road. I’ll be taking the kids to school at that
time tomorrow, all by myself. They need
to be there at 8:00AM. This isn’t going
to work well.
“Hey ladies, let’s chat.
Tomorrow we need to leave right on time.
Not later than 7:40AM. “I need
money for my lunch card!” “SO DO
I.” “Right. OK.
Then we need to leave earlier. No
later than 7:30AM. Is that
understood?”
There is a first frost outside, the next morning. We have a late departure and a late arrival. I sped home quicker than I should and darted
through the door. Flip open the
computer, find my headset, make sure I’m on line. “Hi all.
Sorry to be late."
Some time later, after a second, and then a third, and of
course a fourth follow-up call, I check emails and as always, the New York
Times. If nothing else, one must make
sure the world is still in one piece.
Oh, and there you go . . . the third Republican debates are on, right
about now. I hadn’t realized. Hmm. They’re half over.
Youtube has the debates available in a five part series and
now the G.O.P. are in my kitchen. And it’s
the lot of them against the CNBC amateur team, for the most part. Repeated repudiations of the “mainstream
liberal media.” Reporters looking
ruffled. Carson wafts about. Trump seems oddly congenial with everyone
except Kasich and is denied his electric hate-fuel. Jeb is the person I’d probably least dislike
talking to, but he’s utterly buried. Cruz
is smart, smarmy, repulsive. Marco, as
many will note, seemed crisp. But I’m
underwhelmed by the depth of his poise. It’s
all a bit too studied. He’s the
alpha-lad and yet he seems to be holding on, just barely.
I do not watch television.
But when the debates are on, I convince myself that I must view these
people. I’m obliged to participate in
the main event. And I note my reactions to this spontaneous theatre. Where do I see weakness, fallibility, courage
or clarity? Could I do better? How can one open oneself to such a daunting
glare?