Is it a hoax?
Is it a distraction? Is the
Russian, election-meddling story the new McCarthyite phobia cast upon our
perennial American foe? I’m writing this morning,
listening to Trane play with Miles, turn into Wayne plays with Miles on a
Youtube progression that I’m not controlling, but am enjoying. My buddy texting me insists that the Muller
indictment we read about yesterday is itself a false flag, intended to
exonerate the DRC and HRC from having lost to a circus barker. The impact of Russian meddling, he insists is
vastly overblown.
Blaming foreigners,
be they Russians or terrorists or Chinese, is a distraction as old as America
itself. Acknowledged. I’m particularly sensitive to anything I see
that suggests China is molded into a monolithic demon. So perhaps I am missing it when Russia-phobia
blooms again as it is, before my eyes.
Whether or not it was a well-coordinated state plot hatched by the
Kremlin, or even whether or not these actions were in fact impactful, it does
seem to me that the openness and pervasiveness of platforms like Facebook,
Youtbue and Twitter represent profound new opportunities for misinformation,
manipulation, by state and non-state actors, domestic and foreign actors. That some portion of that experimentation is
conducted by foreign governments seems clear to me. It would, in fact, be surprising if foreign
governments worth their stripes, did not look to exploit such possibilities. That U.S. citizens create and promote the
majority of the electoral misinformation, also seems certain.
In China the U.S. organs
for social media are banned and the domestic versions, are tightly state
controlled. China was fearful of
creating an unregulated public commons, and this was reinforced powerfully as
they watched the Arab Spring unfold. The
ideal of a free, public commons is something America likes to hold dear. But clearly, not much thought went into the
implications for a pervasive, viral network like Facebook where spurious,
anonymous contributions can be catalyzed and metastasized by foreign and
domestic players alike, out of the commons, and into your pockets, into your bedrooms. Policy plays catch-up to ethics in the
disruptive, technological environment of the USA. And, cautiously, that is still the lesser of
two evils: allowing and remediating, rather than never allowing at all.
My wife’s finally
up. I can hear her with the coffee in
the kitchen. She was up late. Cognac and
guzheng. I’m up early.
I’ll step away from the Miles and go and greet the day. There’s a pile of apples that have been
sitting there in the kitchen for some time.
Let me see if we’ve what we need to make them into a pie on this Sunday
morning.
Somewhere, out in
Shandong, in a small daub and wattle village with crude genealogy posters up on
the wall, the men of the village are setting off fireworks, by the ancestral
tombs, tombs that have been moved once or twice on account of road
constructions . . . to send all the ancestors safely back to the
netherworld. They used to walk back but
now it’s a drive and then they’ll be piling in to the homes where the women
folk have the jiaozi bao-ed, ready to
slide into a steaming cauldron, the jiaozi
skin, made from the wheat, that’s grown in the same soil that covers the
tombs . . . But not here in Beijing. Not
for our family this year. Still, I’m wishing
all my ancestors who’ve shared the earth these past few days a safe trip back
to the great beyond. May Miles scare off
any unwanted ghosts.
Sunday, 02/18/18
No comments:
Post a Comment