I submit that Paul Weller has a sensitive
nose. Or at least he did when he was in
the Jam. Jam songs regularly arise on
the random mix of 5000 songs I have spinning about on my iTunes at the
gym. Head over to the chest press and
it’s “Saturday’s Kids.” I just about
never mind listening to "Saturday’s Kids." The next day it might be “Butterfly Collector” and I’m happy to slip
into the world of “All Mod Cons” as I zip up my coat and walk back to the car. Walking out the gym I notice that once again,
he’s mentioning perfume. Why is that?
There are only two
or three people I still know well enough, who know the Jam well enough whom I'd bother asking the following question: Name
three Jam songs that use the word “perfume.”
My father and brother have bonded over their love for crossword
puzzles. Not so I. I have never particularly cared. But perhaps the need to ask this question in
this fashion is related to crossword puzzle-like thinking.
My dearest friend
is the primary target of this pointless line of inquiry. He replies appropriately that this sounds
like some sort of Buddhist koan. I must
look up the word “koan” and, noting that it is Zen riddle used to provoke
enlightenment and I quickly concur, pointing out that, in addition to telling
the girl in her own little dream world that her fashion sense is second-rate
like her perfume, during “Butterfly Collector” on their third album, and that
Saturday’s Kids, wear cheap perfume cause it’s all they can afford on their
fourth album, we hear on their fifth LP that when Paul cuddles a girl, he
smells her stale perfume. I can’t think of
any others. Perhaps there are. I just checked “London Girl” from the second
album to be sure. My friend absorbed
this quietly and chose not to swat the shuttlecock back over the net.
None of this
matters, of course. Who cares that Paul
Weller got repeated mileage out of one word or another? Except that all those songs are stored up
there. They carry great meaning in the
webbing of my formative teenage brain. And when
one revisits them from the vantage of fifty rather than fifteen they reveal
different insights. And when an insight
or a pattern is noted there are only two or three people you know well enough,
who’d care enough to ponder that koan, with you. Perhaps someone in Paul’s life scented
themselves in a notably poor fashion or argued with him about a brand or he
read something somewhere that posited the concept as especially important. This is where my mind was, driving home from
the gym, when I decided it was a pattern that needed to be communicated.
Thursday, 01/25/18
No comments:
Post a Comment