A conversation worth the drive in, with
uninterrupted view out on the dusk from high above the city’s northeast
corner. It started with politics. My friend felt that the current trade
disruption with the U.S. was great for China.
I took exception. He clarified
that the next five years would be hard but China would come out stronger,
because it would force reform. Now we
were more closely aligned. This is going
to put great stress on the coalition behind the façade of unruffled Party
leadership. What emerges may be
stronger. But for now there will be
great pain on the inside of the political body, away from any bruises we can
detect on the skin.
Change, reform or
otherwise, will be forced. President Xi
is under-performing on one of his key performance metrics: Management of the U.S.-China relationship. It’s unclear who in the world, just now
besides Kim Jong Un is managing a relationship with the Trump administration
well, but clearly, China is not. The
Party founded on revolutionary rhetoric is up against our institutionally revolutionary
representative democracy that lately has been especially unpredictable. Waxing then, the great Chinese anathema,
which the Party is pledged to control: uncertainty and instability.
My friend wanted to
assert that China would fill the vacuum of moral leadership that the U.S. was
ceding. I didn’t agree. I don’t think China is ready to or indeed,
wants to fill that void. I think wise
Chinese leaders largely want stability to grow richer without disruption. China has a market and an economic narrative
for the rest of the world to engage with.
But at present, China is not interested in converting anyone to
Chinese-ness. Chinese-ness is not
exportable. Chinese-ness before 1850
meant a uniquely differentiated civilizing beacon that all other peoples
undeniably acknowledged. That ain’t on
the menu in the next century. The
China-dream beyond it getting rich and not interfering in other people’s
affairs is not a fulcrum for imperialism or conversion. If America continues to cede that role something
will necessarily fill it. But let’s
hope, for China’s sake most of all, that this isn’t Chinese-ness. Inchoate national chauvinism will rise back up
emetic, spat out from any of the “uncivilized”, forced to feed on it.
Brilliant red
autumn clouds alight as the sun made its final descent over the capital and we
moved, as I knew we would from intellect to spirit. Why feed our egos with knowledge that is
pointless before unknowable consciousness?”
He wanted to know and I thought of the pleasure and the utility of
knowledge acquisition. I didn’t have a
good answer.
I mentioned the
“Homo Deus” thesis that a hybrid intellect, a post-human capacity to think will
be the new repository of faith. We don’t
know, but AI increasingly knows better than our mere minds can. He took exception. Consciousness is ineffable, beyond our or
anything we creates’ ability to conceptualize or replicate. “What defines you? If you listed all the attributes your ego
associates with you and suddenly removed them, one by one, would the ‘you’,
that is you, still be you? If I cut off
your finger would you still be you? And
if I removed every part of you, one by one, until there was nothing left but
awareness, would you still be you?” I visualized the single, solitary stem left
after all else had been removed. “And
that consciousness, that sole bit remaining, by your own definition is finite,
isn’t it? When it’s gone, it’s
gone.” “Neither you, nor I, nor anything
we ever create, will ever know.”
Darkness of a
sort. The lights of the city mapped a
pathway off towards the airport, beyond the density of the grid. “If I could give you perfect happiness or I
could give you twenty-million dollars, which would you choose? I, like you, would choose the twenty million
dollars, even if I could show you, unquestionably, that it would not make you
happier. Why would we be both make this choice? We are sating our egos and repeating illusory
patterns over and over. Why wouldn’t we
choose to sit in the gutter, happy, with nothing else to our name?” I considered the reality of a two, with seven
zeros after it in my bank account and the abandon of joy in the gutter and
gnawed for a bit on the two destinations, reluctantly.
Absorb the
quiet. Consider our fate. Let’s visit the buffet to sate some of this
not-so- illusory hunger. Dining now, we
smile. We are both ready to finally
discuss how we are going to make some money together.
Thursday, 10/11/18
No comments:
Post a Comment